William Becker, The Climate Policy Expert's Blog

William

Climate Policy Expert

“Obama 2.0”

01 Feb 10 | 3 comments

Obama 2.0

Added 01 Feb 10 by the Climate Policy Expert | 3 comments

Bookmark and Share

The 2nd year of the Obama Era is young, but we may be seeing the emergence of Obama 2.0 – a president willing to do battle against the dark forces of stasis & negativity. Let’s hope so.

Obama 1.0 didn’t want to get ahead of Congress. Obama 2.0 appears ready to go head-to-head with Democrats who have the numbers to lead but lack the discipline, & Republicans whose only big idea is to make Democrats fail – a pretty easy job so far.

Now the President seems open to strategy-change & he’s being flooded with fresh advice. In the Feb. 8 issue of TIME, columnist Mark Halperin suggests that Obama “borrow from the playbook of Ronald Reagan” by becoming bigger than life, standing for a few big things & striking themes with which no self-respecting American patriot – Republican, Democrat or Tea Person -- can disagree.

Halperin is correct. Obama 1.0 worked at playing the Washington game; Obama 2.0 must prove he can change the game, as he had promised. He should lead us in a tectonic shift from the politics of fear to the politics of hope.

The Right claims we are losing the America we love. The Left tells us we are heading towards environmental collapse. Both tell us we should be very afraid. A little fear is good. It teaches us, metaphorically speaking, not to touch the hot pot on the stove. But fear without hope leads to the kind of persistent polarity, political paralysis & apocalypse fatigue that seems to be infecting the American spirit like a pandemic.

As evangelists of hope like to point out, Martin Luther King told us about a dream, not a nightmare. When Reagan accepted the Republican Party’s nomination for president, he talked of a “shining city on a hill”, not a collapsed civilization. Just before taking office in 1961, back in the day when masculine pronouns were still politically correct, John Kennedy invoked the same image, saying:

Today, the eyes of all people are truly upon us – & our governments, in every branch, at every level, national, state & local, must be as a city upon a hill – constructed & inhabited by men aware of their great trust & their great responsibilities.

If I were advising Obama on the big populist ideas that should be the themes for his 2nd year in office, I would recommend he begin a new national conversation about the future – not just the future we must avoid, but also the future we must build. He talks often about the “new energy economy”. It’s the right goal, but TWTS -- Too Wonkish To Sizzle in the popular imagination. Instead, on his next visit to the bully pulpit, Obama 2.0 might say:

We challenge the world’s biggest economies to a “Race to the Top”.

By 2020, the US will be the most resource efficient, innovative, self-sufficient & environmentally responsible economy on the planet.

Again, he has come close, without quite firing the starting pistol. In his State of the Union address, he said:

There’s no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains, or the new factories that manufacture clean energy products…China is not waiting to revamp its economy. Germany is not waiting. India is not waiting… They’re making serious investments in clean energy because they want those jobs. Well, I do not accept 2nd place for the United States of America.

Since China is already in full sprint, let’s make the race official. Let’s throw down the challenge & identify the finish line. Just by participating, we will become a more secure & genuinely prosperous nation. We all know the benefits of weaning ourselves from carbon-intensive fuels – particularly imported oil: We’ll plug some of the biggest leaks in our economy, clean the air, free ourselves from other nations that don’t have our best interests at heart, eliminate the temptation to meddle in parts of the world where we are not welcome, undermine Osama Bin Laden’s influence by taking away some of his best recruiting arguments, & eliminate the need to send our sons & daughters to kill & be killed in oil wars.

In the future we want, Obama 2.0 might say, we’ll shift the epicenters of U.S. energy production from places like the Middle East, Nigeria & Venezuela to places like North Dakota, Oklahoma & Texas. We’ll wildcat the sun. Our farms & rural communities will become prosperous & robust again as they earn new income by harvesting wind, sunlight & sustainable energy crops; & by providing carbon sequestration services through advanced soil & forest management.

The 2nd big idea for Obama 2.0 involves national security. He should build on the theme advanced by some military experts that the US must be as skilled at nation building as it is at war-fighting. The President might say:

It is time to redefine national defense to meet the new realities of the 21st Century. We must be prepared not only to fight wars, but also to prevent them by redoubling our efforts to help developing nations build prosperity & stability where there now is poverty, instability & despair. Among the new realities of national security is the growing threat to the environmental systems that support life in some of the world’s most volatile regions. We have come to a time when solar cells & wind turbines are as important to world security as guns & tanks. We must beat some of our swords into solar collectors. Investments in clean energy are the new defense spending.

He should continue:

It has never been more obvious that we are one world. The global economic crisis, the global flu pandemic, the global food crisis & the fact that every person’s pollution now threatens the health & welfare of everyone else -- these are incontrovertible physical evidence that all people of all nations are connected. So, we recommit the United States to the international goal of ending extreme poverty with sustainable technologies & progress. We will share our knowledge & resources to help less developed nations achieve decent, safe & sanitary lives for their people. We will show through deeds as well as words what we know in our hearts to be true: No one is secure until all people are secure; no one can prosper while so many in our country & around the world are poor; & our future depends on building a global ecological economy in which we sustain the natural systems that sustain us.

Finally, Obama 2.0 might reemphasize that to achieve these goals all Americans must become nation-builders in their communities. Every American should commit to doing three things every day to “green” our lives, at home & work. He can explain it this way:

We will be the architects of our future, or its victims. From this moment forward, we choose to be its architects. When the rest of the world looks upon our city on the hill, it will see generosity rather than greed, hope rather than despair, sustainable prosperity rather than economic collapse. Creating that proverbial city is America’s mission for the next decade.

To help the American people get involved the President should engage organizations & individuals across America who already are creating images of the future, often out of the spotlight – for example, the America 2050 project of the Regional Plan Association & the Future We Want project at Natural Capitalism Solutions.

He should convene America’s leading experts in energy, finance, business, labor & governance, along with the Departments of Energy, Interior, Agriculture & Commerce & the EPA, to propose a 10-year plan to win the race to the top – the goals, timetables, policies & voluntary actions we’ll need from government & the private sector nationwide. Among other things, the plan will lay out how the industries & workers that built America over the last two centuries – from steelworkers & automakers to the oil, gas & coal industries -- will make the transition with the rest of us & play an essential role in building the new energy economy.

So far, as Joe Romm has put it, we have been missing a “Pearl Harbor moment” to unify & mobilize us. We’ve been missing a Sputnik moment like the one that inspired us to win the space race. But in reality, similar moments are upon us again, unfolding so gradually that some of us have failed to see them while others deny their urgency. The insidious, destabilizing effect of climate change & carbon energy is our Pearl Harbor moment. China’s drive to overtake the US as the global technology leader is our Sputnik moment. How we respond will say everything about whether America is capable of getting its mojo working again.

It won’t be easy to start, let alone sustain, a national zeitgeist of hope. Not everyone will lay down his placard or rise from his barcalounger. Some of our most visible personalities & institutions – ranging from the traditional news media to the Querulous Class on television, radio & in the blogosphere – make their livings in the negativity business. They appeal to an audience more entertained by trash talk than happy talk & to news media that thrive on conflict. When there’s not enough conflict, the news media invent it or give airtime to those who do – for example, the made-for-television Tea Party. This is a time when a measurable audience share considers Glenn Beck & cage fighting to be good television.

Nevertheless, I believe we can create a parade that most Americans will want to join & most politicians will want to lead. We have an historic challenge, trans-partisan in nature, global in scope, epochal in importance, requiring equal measures of intelligence & morality. Like other presidents in times of cusp & crisis, Obama 2.0 may be able to rally us out of peevishness & help us unify around a transcendent common purpose. If he does not, or if we don’t respond, we are very likely to default to the future we fear.

America 2050: http://www.america2050.org

Future We Want: http://www.futurewewant.org

Nation building: http://http://bit.ly/drDGTa

China is not waiting: http://http://bit.ly/cqXkMt

William

William Becker

Climate Policy Expert

Serves as the Exec. Director of the Presidential Climate Action Project (PCAP). Served as Senior official at the U.S. Department of Energy (15 years)

view full biography >

View all of William Becker's blog entries >

Comments

There's a total of 3 comments for this blog entry. Have your say and add your own comment here.

1/

A very powerful opinion piece. There should be a paradigm shift in the "Right" "Left" behavior to portray a deep sense of patriotism for the betterment of the American people. - Mubarick Masawudu

04 Feb 2010 - 09:21 GMT

2/

The direction that you propose is nobel and could be good for the nation. You have called on president Obama to become an evangelist and to transform himself to sell a vision. The problems and messages are complex and challenging to understand. People, the public and electorate, tend to make major decisions based on emotion not necessarily fact. To be successful change will be required. We (the public) don't want to do what is right because it often involves making and accepting changes. In order to transform himself, President Obama will have to make his appeal in a credible manner that works to unify the country. We elected a platform of change, but this change can't be forced down upon us. Creating a concensus is a big part of leadership. a consensus is not unanimous consent, it is not following the lastest poll results. Create the vision and working a steady plan to fill the vision will get the job done in a positive way. In order to get this job done he needs to get the people behind him just as President Reagan did. Finding the vision and communicating it is the first step. Asking for the help of the nation to implement the vision will be necessary to create a consensus that can help move us forward. There much to do. People think a green economy will be a train wreck. I disagree, there is so much potential for good. Good for the environment, good for our defense because we will reduce our dependence on foreign sources in a "Sustainable" economy, good for the social climate and the public in general. Change is tough. It requires sacrifices but if all do their share and if strong leadership believes in this vision, real meaningful change will come. Our president is losing a PR war because he has lost touch with the people. I ask is this the isolation resulting from being trapped in the presidency? I have much to say, but the main message is to create the consensuses that are required in order to move us forward. Polarization does not work. The Massechusettes voters sent that message, loud and clear.

06 Feb 2010 - 13:56 GMT

3/

UAUBMm <a href="http://zxxrjjczekpo.com/">zxxrjjczekpo</a>, [url=http://tjsgfqyipclw.com/]tjsgfqyipclw[/url], [link=http://ordeyuhhcyei.com/]ordeyuhhcyei[/link], http://qkcoafzwmrzk.com/

18 Apr 2010 - 07:51 BST

Add your comment…